LD-NovDec2011


 * [[image:Home_Forensics_Toolbox.png link="Forensics_Toolbox"]] || [[image:Home_Debatepedia.png link="@http://wiki.idebate.org"]] || [[image:LD-Debate.png link="LD-Debate"]] ||

=Resolved: Individuals have a moral obligation to assist people in need.=

Central tension: Generosity vs. Self-Preservation Object of Evaluation: Individuals Evaluative Term: moral obligation Context of Resolution: people in need Definition of terms: Value Premise
 * moral obligation
 * to assist
 * people in need
 * The greatest moral obligation is to ...
 * Golden Rule (Reciprocity Principle)?
 * Silver Rule (Harm Principle )?
 * Platinum Rule ?

Possible Contentions Charity harms the originator Charity harms the receiver Generosity benefits the originator Generosity benefits the receiver

The greatest moral obligation is to treat others as you would be treated. Reciprocity benefits those in need. Reciprocity benefits the benefactor. Reciprocity ensures social cohesion.

The greatest moral obligation is to do no harm. Generosity can backfire. provide no help. interfere with successful strategies. receive no benefit in return. might be harmed in return. Following the Harm Principle is consistent with good works. self-interested actions spill-over from strength

NFL's Topic Analysis